Stuff You Should Read 10/1/06
When Can We Criticize The War Effort? - It's OK to criticize before it starts, but not after it begins? Does that makes sense in sports, employment, or anything else?
How the "Christian" Right is so dead wrong.
When Can We Criticize The War Effort? - It's OK to criticize before it starts, but not after it begins? Does that makes sense in sports, employment, or anything else?
We have seen America’s president and vice president, sworn to uphold the Constitution, advocating some of the same interrogation techniques the KGB used at the Lubyanka. They apparently believe beating, freezing, sleep deprivation and near-drowning are necessary to prevent terrorist attacks. So did Stalin.
The White House insisted that anyone — including Americans — could be kidnapped and tried in camera using “evidence” obtained by torturing other suspects. Bush & Co. deny the U.S. uses torture but reject the basic law of habeaus corpus and U.S. laws against the evil practice. The UN says Bush’s plans violate international law and the Geneva Conventions.
Full article hereThe United States is following the lead of "dirty war" nations, such as Argentina and Chile, in enacting what amounts to an amnesty law protecting U.S. government operatives, apparently up to and including President George W. Bush, who have committed or are responsible for human rights crimes.
While the focus of the current congressional debate has been on Bush's demands to redefine torture and to reinterpret the Geneva Conventions, the compromise legislation also would block prosecutions for violations already committed during the five-year-old "war on terror."
Full article here
I don't understand how anyone can defend this or stand behind Bush at this point.
The 5-4 decision continues a string of rulings since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that in general give law enforcement greater discretion to carry out search-and-seizure warrants.
Woo hoo, man, you gotta love them terrorist attacks! Now we can treat those crackheads like the terrorists they really are. Because everyone knows that when you buy drugs, you're paying for Osama's next massage parlor visit.
President Bush's nominees to the high court, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, notably sided with the government.
What a disaster.
Full story here
The United States spends by far the most on health care per person -- more than twice as much as Europe, Canada, and Japan which all have some version of national health insurance. Yet we are near the bottom in nearly every measure of our health.
The World Health Organization (WHO) ranks the U.S. health care system 37th of 190 countries, well below most of Europe, and trailing Chile and Costa Rica. The United States does even worse in the WHO rankings of performance on level of health -- a stunning 72nd. Life expectancy in the U.S. is shorter than in 27 other countries; the U.S. ties with Hungary, Malta, Poland, and Slovakia for infant mortality -- ahead of only Latvia among industrialized nations.
Although you'd never know it from the American media, the number of Canadians who would trade their system for a U.S.-style health care system is just eight percent.
Perhaps the single most common refrain from the White House and the president's allies is that there have been no terrorist attacks on U.S. soil since Sept. 11, 2001. That's incorrect — about a month after 9/11, someone sent weaponized anthrax to two Democratic senators and several news outlets. Five Americans were killed and 17 more suffered serious illnesses.
For reasons that I've never been able to explain, the incident — I suppose one should call it an "attack" — is hardly ever mentioned. No one knows where the anthrax came from, who sent it, or why. It was a horrifying incident, immediately on the heels of another horrifying incident, but five years later, it's almost as if the episode never happened.
One woman in Florida who was widowed by the attack is still waiting for some answers, and she's willing to go to court to get them.
It's a good thing she's still among the living...otherwise we wouldn't even have this story to remind us.
After years of hard work by drug warriors in Afghanistan, the country no longer produces 87 percent of the world's illicit opium. Now it produces 92 percent, according to the latest suspiciously precise estimate from the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).
On Tuesday, citing ties between opium trafficking and the Taliban insurgency, UNODC Executive Director Antonio Maria Costa called upon NATO forces in Afghanistan to get more involved in efforts to stamp out the opium trade. This is exactly the right strategy to pursue if the aim is to alienate the Afghan people, undermine their government, and strengthen the insurgency.
Full article hereSo big corporations have devised a form of idea laundering, paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to seemingly independent groups that act as spokesmen under disguise.
Their views wind up on the opinion pages of the nation's newspapers - often with no disclosure that the writer has financial ties to the companies involved. A few examples:
- John Semmens, a policy adviser at the Heartland Institute, wrote a column for the Louisville Courier-Journal that called Wal-Mart "a major force in promoting prosperity for everyone." Readers were not told that his think tank had received more than $300,000 from the Walton Family Foundation, run by the heirs of Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton.
The Bush administration has a habit of doing this too. Taken together with my previous post on Public Relations ethics, you have to wonder if there is any honest discourse in non-internet media at all aside from John Stewart and Stephen Colbert!
To me, this speaks volumes about the nature of corporations.
I started this blog not with the intent to get involved in the progressive political movement, but to help expose the corruption, dishonesty, and greed that has infected American society so successfully that it is very difficult to get the truth about anything at all unless we actively hunt it down and possess the critical thinking skills necessary to discern what is and is not propaganda.
- Our freedoms disappear in the name of wars on terror and drugs that are based entirely on fiction and deceit. Many of us still haven’t noticed because we’re not supposed to. As far as government is concerned, our duty is to be in fear of more attacks. Meanwhile, our government insists on using our sons and daughters to lay waste to entire countries - tearing apart families, accomplishing nothing and endangering all Americans.
- Our bodies are poisoned by many of the foods we have been led to believe are good for us, while the foods that traditionally have been healthy are now tampered with in ways that are more than shocking. Meanwhile, our public schools are awash in sugar and junk food, worsening our already awful obesity problems.
- Many of us work more and earn less, while many of the wealthier among us have it the other way around. While this is not new, the gap between rich and the rest has widened considerably over the last few years.
- The United States is now the only industrialized nation (aside from China) that goes without universal health care. As a result, almost half the country goes without medical care because they are unable to afford skyrocketing insurance premiums – and it kills people. Despite the success many other countries have had with universal health care, our media and elected officials treat the idea as if it is an untested experiment that would be irresponsible to implement!
- Technology is being locked down. Have you ever had trouble playing a DVD in your standalone player or on your computer? Thank Digital Rights Management, the holy grail of the movie, music, and software industries. With Vista and its Trusted Computing, things are going to get a lot worse than just a few minor inconveniences. The internet’s days as a haven for free speech and a source for truthful information may well be numbered once Trusted Computing becomes entrenched in our everyday lives.
There’s growing concern among economists and market-savvy pundits that the global financial system is hanging by a few well-worn threads that could snap at any time. The $10.4 trillion real estate “bubble” has attracted the most attention, but the shaky derivatives market, hedge funds, and falling dollar are equally worrisome. 20 years of deregulation has created an economic monster which is increasingly unmanageable and threatens to bring down the whole system in a heap.
...“The entire global financial structure is becoming uncontrollable in crucial ways its nominal leaders never expected. Instability is increasingly its hallmark….Contradictions now wrack the world’s financial system, and if we are to believe the institutions and personalities who have been in the forefront of the defense of capitalism, it may very well be on the verge of serious crisis.”
In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.
Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
Full story here and here
Those who refuse to believe that BushCo was behind the 9/11 attacks really should take some time out, read the Northwoods document (which can be found here), and then take a serious look at all the stuff that has been dismissed as "conspiracy theories". They're not talking about alien cover-ups and grassy knolls. There exists quite a bit of truly chilling evidence that suggests US complicity in the attacks, and the government has categorically refused to address or even acknowledge much of it. Even Time now says:
A Scripps-Howard poll of 1,010 adults last month found that 36% of Americans consider it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that government officials either allowed the attacks to be carried out or carried out the attacks themselves. Thirty-six percent adds up to a lot of people. This is not a fringe phenomenon. It is a mainstream political reality.